Absurdist literature also highlights the broader societal implications of unchecked power. Kafka and Camus frequently explore themes of alienation and dehumanization, emphasizing how systems of authority often strip individuals of their agency. In Hitchcock’s case, his influence extended beyond professional boundaries, affecting Hedren’s personal sense of autonomy. “This dynamic is reflective of what Kafka describes as the “untouchable administration” of power, wherein individuals are rendered powerless in the face of institutional authority” (Kafka, 1998, p. 43). By examining Hitchcock’s actions through this lens, it becomes evident that his behavior was not merely a personal failing but a symptom of a larger cultural epidemic that prioritizes power over accountability. 

Moreover, absurdism’s critique of societal norms offers a framework for understanding the entertainment industry’s response to allegations of harassment. The industry’s reluctance to address such issues often stems from a desire to maintain the status quo, prioritizing profit and reputation over ethical considerations. This tendency is exemplified by the entertainment industry's dismissal of Hedren’s allegations, which were largely overshadowed by Hitchcock’s celebrated legacy. Camus’s exploration of the absurd highlights the contradictions within such systems, where the pursuit of success often comes at the expense of moral integrity. According to Camus, the “absurd man” rejects these contradictions, embracing the inherent chaos of existence while striving for authenticity and ethical behavior. 

This critique extends to the societal acceptance of hierarchical power structures, which often perpetuate cycles of abuse. Absurdism challenges the legitimacy of such structures, emphasizing the need for individuals to resist harmful systems. By exposing the irrationality of societal norms, absurdist literature encourages readers to question the values and priorities that underpin these frameworks. In the case of Hitchcock and Hedren, this perspective underscores the importance of recognizing and addressing the systemic factors that enable harassment in the workplace. 

The relevance of absurdism in contemporary discussions of power and accountability cannot be overstated. As evidenced by scholarly interpretations of Kafka and Camus, absurdist literature provides a powerful lens for critiquing the irrationality of social systems and the dehumanizing effects of authority. By highlighting the disconnect between human values and institutional priorities, absurdism offers a compelling framework for understanding the dynamics of harassment and abuse. This perspective not only sheds light on the specific case of Hitchcock and Hedren but also underscores the broader implications of systemic dysfunctions, urging society to confront and challenge the structures that perpetuate injustice. 

In conclusion, Hitchcock’s treatment of Hedren serves as a poignant example of the absurdist struggle between social systems and individual autonomy. From the perspectives of Kafka and Camus, Hitchcock’s actions reflect the moral and existential contradictions inherent in hierarchical structures, where authority often operates without accountability. By examining these dynamics through an absurdist lens, it becomes clear that the societal epidemic of harassment is deeply rooted in the frameworks that prioritize power and reputation over justice and human dignity. Absurdism not only critiques these structures but also inspires individuals to resist and challenge the systems that perpetuate harm. In doing so, it offers a powerful call to action, urging society to prioritize ethical behavior and accountability in the face of systemic injustice.